| As a Fellowship Trained Joint Replacement Surgeon, I | | | | that time. By using specialized instrumentation, newer |
| am often asked about the latest developments in | | | | generation hip implants, a custom operating table, and |
| arthritis surgery. With the advent of minimally invasive | | | | real time intraoperative x-ray equipment, anterior hip |
| techniques in orthopedic surgery there has been a | | | | replacement has made a resurgence. These additions |
| renewed interest in performing hip replacement | | | | have allowed the the anterior approach to become |
| through the front (anterior) of the hip as opposed to | | | | easier and more reliable to perform than before. |
| the more traditional posterior, or backside approach. | | | | What are the drawbacks to anterior hip replacement? |
| The logic behind anterior hip replacement is to try to | | | | Performing an anterior total hip replacement requires |
| minimize muscle damage by separating muscles to | | | | positioning on a special operating table with the legs |
| gain access to the front of the hip as opposed to | | | | attached directly to the table. By manipulating the |
| releasing and repairing the muscles to gain access to | | | | table, the leg is positioned to insert the hip stem. |
| the hip joint form behind. In short, there is no perfect | | | | Since it is difficult to judge how much force is applied |
| way to deliver implants to the hip joint. If there | | | | to the leg, fractures in the leg bones have occurred |
| were, we would all be performing that approach only | | | | on the operating table. The implants are placed using |
| for hip replacement surgery. Having given you this | | | | real time x-ray equipment; if that equipment is |
| background, these are the most frequently asked | | | | malpositioned the implants can be misplaced leading to |
| questions encountered in my office: | | | | potential increased wear or dislocation and a painful |
| Is anterior hip replacement a new technique? | | | | joint. |
| No. The anterior hip approach was first described by | | | | Is it true that hips done through an anterior approach |
| Smith-Petersen in 1917. It was used by the French | | | | will not dislocate? |
| surgeon, Robert Judet, in 1947 to perform an isolated | | | | No. All hip replacements can dislocate. Historically, the |
| femoral head replacement. This later evolved into | | | | incidence of dislocation from an anterior approach is |
| other French surgeons performing complete hip joint | | | | less than through a posterior approach. However with |
| replacements through an anterior exposure in the | | | | a new generation of hip replacements, the use of |
| 1960's. | | | | larger femoral head replacements has reduced the |
| If this technique has been in existence since 1960, | | | | incidence of hip dislocations for all approaches. |
| why all the interest now? | | | | What hip approach do you recommend? |
| Early surgeons found that the visualization of the hip | | | | I recommend finding a surgeon who is versed in |
| socket was excellent through the front of the hip; | | | | anterior, posterior, and anterolateral hip replacement. |
| however it was very difficult to insert a long straight | | | | Since every hip exposure has specific pros and cons, |
| metal stem down the femur through an anterior | | | | it is the job of the surgeon to match each individual |
| approach. If complications occurred during surgery it | | | | patient's need to the specific approach. Patients and |
| was very difficult to change or extend the anterior | | | | surgeons want to minimize pain and speed recovery, |
| approach to overcome difficult surgeries and provide | | | | yet the main objective of hip replacement is to |
| for better visualization. Therefore, most surgeons | | | | provide patients with a well done operation, with |
| opted to perform hip replacement through posterior, | | | | good component position, and the expectation that it |
| or posterior and lateral exposures. The posterior | | | | will last for the next 20-30 years. |
| approach has become the standard of care since | | | | |