Hip Resurfacing Advanced Training Course For Surgeons - Overview From a Patient's Perspective

It was very interesting to watch the doctors presentto guide the doctor in placement of the pin and find
from the doctors perspective but it is quite differentthe exact center of the femoral neck.
coming from our side. When we look at it as OURApproaches were discussed and again there is
bodies they are cutting open, it changes the wholedisagreement among the surgeons as to which
view. The following is my view as a patient. Vickyapproach is better, the conclusion was the approach
This overview of the conference I attended inthat works the best for the doctor to get the best
Belgium, June 25 - 28, 2008 are notes that I tookresults that doctor can get for his patient is the best
during the presentations and sessions as well as myapproach to be used by that doctor. Dr. De Smet
own personal opinions and thoughts on the subject. Itsaid during his live surgery via video feed that he
is in no way scientific data. To summarize thehated seeing patients of his coming in a year or two
conference in two sentences, I will quote Mr. McMinn,post op limping badly with a well placed prosthesis
one of the inventors of the BHR (Birmingham Hipdue to having had an antero lateral approach and
Resurfacing device):Bad results of Resurfacings aredamage to the gluteus medius muscle.
the result of badly done Resurfacing - Derek McMinnNeck capsule preservation, during De Smets live
Also I will quote Dr. Koen DeSmet a surgeon that hassurgery he stressed the importance of NOT cutting
done more hip resurfacings than the majority ofthrough the capsule, just release it to save
surgeons in the world. A WELL DONE resurfacingvascularity. Doctors that remove the soft tissue will
works well, but is TECHNICALLY DIFFICULT. - Koensee more neck notching. It was interesting to see
DeSmet McMinns quote was mentioned on severalthat many of the doctors on the panel DID remove
occasions throughout the conference and mainly haseither the entire neck capsule or a large portion of it.
to do with the technical difficulty of resurfacing inHopefully they will learn after this course the
general. It was clear to me again after attending myimportance of preserving the neck capsule.
third orthopedic conference that the aboveMetal Ions
statement is SO true and was reinforced in severalJury is still out on this subject. Pat Campbell is now
of the sessions during this conference. It appears theindependently doing implant retrieval studies. I believe
many problems that exist today with resurfacingsany patient that is diagnosed with metal allergies as
have to do with the surgeon and technique. As withthe cause of pain or ALVAL should insist that their
Real Estate the three important factors beingdoctor send their removed device to Pats lab for a
location, location, location, with hip resurfacing it isfull study to find out for sure if that was indeed the
experience, experience, experience AND I will add toreason for failure. My concern is that there will be
that SKILL.doctors that have poorly placed devices that are
My thoughts: I know many newer patients that postcausing impingement and higher metal wear and then
on the Yahoo Surface Hippy Message board andturning around and blaming it on metal allergies when
choose to go to newer surgeons or end up havingit could be a reaction to high metal wear due to the
no choice due to financial matters or insurancemalpositioned implant. It is easier to blame it on the
limitations get upset by those of us that keeppatient than it is to accept the idea that the surgeon
repeating the importance of picking a surgeon withmisplaced the device or notched the neck and the
experience. I wish these patients would justbone under the cap has collapsed as a result and it
understand that many of us take hours out of ourhas nothing to do with metal allergies.
every day lives to HELP people. Misguiding someoneThey do have lymphocyte tests now but they are
to a newer inexperienced surgeon is NOT myrare to find. Not sure what they will prove. I have
definition of helping someone. When the question ispersonally volunteered myself as a case study since I
asked, well then, who will be in a doctors first 100? Ihave extreme metal sensitivity and have had my
will tell you who, those that do not care to take theBHR now for over 3 years, so I am now past the 2
time to research alternatives. Those like the guy Iyear danger zone for ALVAL to show up.
ran into that was scheduled for a THR and when IAs far as metal ions on women of child bearing age,
told him about resurfacing his response was that hisboth Amstutz and De Smet agree on the fact that it
doctor did not do them and he trusted his doctor.should not be an issue for women of child bearing
The gal that posted a week or so ago saying sheage where many doctors will not implant MoM (Metal
was having a THR in a few days and wanted to talkon Metal) resurfacings. The question is, are poly
to others that had been through it. I emailed herdebris really any better for an unborn fetus?
offline and no matter what I told her, she was notAmstutz has had no evidence and has had patients
going to postpone her surgery that Monday, she waswith high levels of metal sensitivity with no problems
just going to let her surgeon give her a THR. Ashowing up at all. Very important issue to keep in
surgeon that never even told her what resurfacingmind that there are TWO parts to the metal ions
even was and she was in her 30s! Well those are thediscussion.
patients that can end up being in a doctors first 100,Wear related problem (Metallosis) is very different
the ones that go into a doctors office and just willthan metal sensitivity. (Hypersensitivity, Inflammatory
listen to what they are told and end up with whatlymphocytes)
they get. Like the poor woman many of us met atThey have found that activity has NO correlation to
De Smets brunch in SF. She could barely walk withmetal ions.
crutches because the Hemi-prosthesis with a largeProblems with HRA
femoral stem device her doctor had placed inside her,· Impingement
De Smet flat out told her he would never use a· Socket problems
device like that on anyone unless it was a woman inThe following was a slide regarding the conclusions
her late 90s that he knew was going to bedrawn on metal ions.
wheelchair bound anyway and had very few yearsConclusions
left to live. This woman was in her 40s and was· Significant differences between current
there to get a consult with De Smet. Last I heard,generation resurfacing devices
she is going to go back to the same doctor that did· Those differences are less important
that to her in the first place to fix it, if you cancompared to the extreme high levels due to
believe that!As far as I am concerned, those thatmalpositioning of components
take the time to seek out information and find their· Some patients have elevated ion levels
way to the surface hippy message board or thepreoperatively for unknown reason
referenced web site or email me offline for help, well· No correlation between ion levels and
they deserve to know the truth. Not MY truth butactivity
the truth even all of the top surgeons speak. There· Correct positioning of components is crucial
IS a learning curve with hip resurfacing. HRA is a veryAcetabuler Malposition Early problems - dislocation,
different procedure than a THR, completely different.Later problems Impingement
Now onto what I learned at the conference and myLessons to be learned
notes. Dr. Amstutz - Technique - Crucial Overall theComponent misalignment leads to increased - even
majority of the problems found in hip resurfacing aredramatic - wear
surgeon related. Cup malpositioning, femoralNot a gradual but a step increase
component placement off, can cause impingement,Positioning of implants (inclination, anteversion, relative
neck fractures, femoral neck thinningpositioning)
Contraindications for hip resurfacingVery early failures: head
Age - Some doctors are still using age as a possibleLater failures: cup (wear) Bursae
contraindication. It appears the more experience aPainful Resurfacing - Dr. Schmalzried lead this panel
surgeon has, the more open they are to taking casesdiscussion and started it off by saying, folks this
for older patients, some doctors will look only at alooks like we have very bad news here. From what
patients bone density - quality and not worry abouthe heard during the discussions, the biggest problem
age.Dr. Amstutz takes much older patients more andwith resurfacings was a surgeon problem. It was all
more now. He is of the firm belief that eventually hiptechnical in nature. So again, back to McMinns quote
resurfacing will always be a first choice for anyand back to what I and many others on the board
patient unless the condition of the patient warrantslike Alan Ray, Chris Saunders and I say over and
otherwise.Dr. Amstutz began hip resurfacing 35 yearsover again, EXPERIENCE. The more experienced a
ago and in 1987 he started with large diameter heads.surgeon is the better your chances of a successful
He has done some patients that maybe should notresurfacing that will last you a lifetime with no
get resurfaced but if they request it, he will tell themproblems of impingement or long term pain issues like
the risks and possibly still do it.My own personalongoing groin pain, etc.
opinion - I was extremely impressed with Dr.Devices
Schmalzried, we spent a lot of time talking andThere are a lot of different devices out there, each
debating the THR vs. Resurfacing issue. Overall Ihas its pluses and minuses. Apparently the Conserve
thought he added a lot to the whole conference andPlus, the Durom and the ASR device have stems
the sessions that he moderated, I felt he brought aproportionate to the device size. With the BHR the
nice balance to what could have turned into heatedstem is the same exact size no matter what size the
debates, where he was able to bring the panels tocomponent is. The smaller the femoral neck the
some form of agreement in a way that arrived at asmaller the stem needs to be for proper stress
conclusion for the surgeons that were there to learnshielding. With a component size smaller than a 42
to allow them to take something away from thatwhich is what I have, a BHR should not be used. So a
session and learn from it. Regarding my personal40 or a 38 should always be used with one of the
conversations with Dr. S, I definitely agree with himother devices due to the stem size of the BHR. From
to a certain point, in that certain patients, THRs willwhat I understand the C+ device has not been
be a better option and solution for them. There areavailable in India therefore Dr. Bose uses the ASR in
three cases in particular that come to my mind. Athese cases. Dr. De Smet chooses to use various
friend that I received permission from to post herdifferent devices. He believes the best resurfacing
pictures from her surgery,devices out there right now are the BHR and the C+.
To see photos of one patient (very graphic on theYou will see his explanation in his latest video
referenced website by clicking on Stories-43 year oldinterview that I did with him in Belgium. See the
female patient..) I must warn you, the photos arereferenced website under Doctors>Video
extremely graphic images of live surgery.Interviews. The Wright C+ with its A class material
To show just how bad her bone quality was andthat has recently been patented appears to have the
how advanced her AVN had become in such a shortlowest metal wear of all the implants available out
period of time. Her femur literally fell apart like chalkthere. Please watch Dr. Amstutz video interview for
during her surgery. There was just no way she wasmore information about the C+ device. The stem
going to get a BHR or even a BMHR, a large MoMalso is smaller than the BHR stem and therefore it will
THR was her only option. She will indeed be verywork better in smaller boned patients. Or patients
happy with it. Another case is the gal that posted onthat have a narrower femoral neck sizes.
the Yahoo Message board a couple of months agoDe Smets live surgery
that woke up hysterically when she found out sheHe keeps the patients blood pressure usually around
ended up with a THR because she felt it was the60 - 65. There are so many steps he takes to make
end of her world as she knew it. Another youngsure the patient gains the correct anatomy.
patient in his early thirties contacted me offline and IMeasuring, re-measuring, angles, depths, placement,
emailed his x-rays to three doctors for theiramounts removed to maintain equal leg lengths,
evaluations. One top doctor recommended THRs dueneutral position of guide pin. Heterotopic ossification
to the patient's anatomy as well as severalprevention, placing protective cloth to protect the
deformities in both his hips. Another top doc thoughttissue from bone fragments, believe it or not, not all
maybe a 50/50 chance for resurfacing on one sidedoctors do that, just watch some of the live video
but a definite THR on the other. His comment wassurgeries available online for viewing and you will see
that it does not make sense to give a patient a HRAthe difference between sloppy and exceptional work.
if it does not restore the patient's anatomy. The thirdRemoving osteophytes, if you do not remove them,
doctor also a top doctor said he would do his best tothe patient will impinge. So some of you patients
preserve the patients bone stock due to his verycomplaining of pain might have had osteophytes that
young age, but since it was such an extremelythe doctor left in you. Again, the importance of
difficult case, he could not say until he got inside forpicking an experienced surgeon for this. De Smet has
sure what would be the best for the patient. Onerevised around 63-65 malpositioned resurfacings done
thing I have learned out of my past 3+ years ofby other doctors. Dr. De Smet now uses a smaller
experience posting on this board and speaking toincision than he used to, about half the size he did
probably close to 1000 patients and many topbefore.
surgeons is that we as a group have such a passionRehab
for hip resurfacing as in many ways we should BUT,Dr. De Smet came across pool therapy quite by
we need to keep in mind that it is not a one size fitsaccident. He found that his patients were going into
all solution.the pool at the Holiday Inn with a special waterproof
One Industry professional, Martyn, made a point thatSTERILE bandage and they were recovering at a
there should be a device for each individual patient,much quicker pace than ever before. This is the
and that device should be the best solution for them.reason for him adopting this in his post op rehab
Whether it be an HRA a device similar to a BMHR orprotocol now and for Hugo starting the Villa for aqua
a THR. The part that I disagree with when it cametherapy sessions beginning day two post op for all
to my debate/discussion with Schmalzried is that mypatients.
belief is similar to Amstutz which is the same as DeDr. Kim in Ottawa does not encourage running or high
Smet, Bose, Su, McMinn, Treacy (I believe it isimpact for any of his patients.
anyway) that each individual patient should beAmstutz believes a patient can do anything with their
treated as that, a unique individual and evaluated onimplant, it will just have a shorter life of the implant
what their anatomy, bone quality activity level, etc. is.the same way you would wear a normal hip with
A doctor should not say all women over 55,higher impact, you will also wear a metal hip or the
immediately turn down and without even looking atbone around it.
the x-rays say a THR would be the better optionThe following were taken off of slides that were
that I strongly disagree with. So to summarize, Ipresented that I took a picture of:
have a whole new level of respect for Dr. ThomasAnesthesiologist
Schmalzried after spending a considerable amount ofBlood transfusion
time speaking with him. I agree with him on many2004 5.9%
things he says but the one area that we will need to2005 5.1% control hypertension
agree to disagree is where that line is drawn as to2006 2.5% Cell saver
which patients should be resurfaced and which ones2007 1.0% Tranexamic acid
should not. He is an excellent surgeon, I have noMM Resurfacing
doubt about that as well as his dedication toConserve Plus
providing his patients with the best possible care andTechnique changes
outcome, but if you have a difficult case or are a3rd Generation (current technique n=329)
female over age 55, I would think about going to a· Intertrochanteric suction (since 1/04)
different doctor. If you are a female under 55, a· Carbojet (since 4/04)
healthy active male in his 40s with a straight case of· Thin shells (since 10/03)
OA, then by all means Dr. S would make an excellent· Larger chamfer (Europeanc remaing
choice." Correction here - I received an email from Dr.-170°)
Schmalzried that states his position is as follows on· Cementing stem for large (>1cm) cysts
July 16, 2008only and small component size Uncemented
I have resurfaced women in their 60s and men inAmstutz worries about the coating on the stem of
their 70s. Age is not the salient criteria - but athe Cormet device still cause head stress shielding,
surrogate for bone density and life expectancy on aone of the panel members brought up that wouldn't
population basis. Each patient has to be evaluatedyou say the same about your method of cementing
individually to assess the benefit-to-risk ratio ofthe stem? He said he does not see it as the same,
resurfacing v. THR for them. - Thomas P.that he sees cementing the stem as just part of
Schmalzried, M.D.being a filler. He did a series of a blind study of 400
On the subject of Learning Curvescontrolled group half stems cemented half
The really experienced surgeons all admitted thatuncemented and so far no difference between the
they are STILL learning today. Dr. Amstutz, Dr. Detwo. Not one failure yet in a cemented stem some
Smet, Dr. OHara, all have done well over 1000 hipgoing on 8 years. Now he just only cements the
resurfacings and they all agree that the learning curvestem on patients he would otherwise do a THR on.
continues. Amstutz made the comment that NO twoOn cementless he says there has to be a perfect fit
femoral heads are the same.between the bone and the component. The
This technology is still in its infant stages and theyconsensus on cemented is that it is fine. The
are still perfecting the devices, the instrumentation,foundation of bone needs to be good enough for
the placement of the cups, the angles of thecementless. There was a whole discussion on cement
components, the soft tissue preservation methods,mantle thickness that went into a lot of detail. You
the incision sizes, the anesthesia, the rehab protocols.can see the slides later on Pat's website under Dr.
Some mentioned that the newer doctors do haveSchmalzrieds presentations.
the advantage of learning from doctors that haveTo summarize the whole conference, again, I will
gone before them to avoid the same mistakes. Iquote Derek McMinn and Koen De Smet
agree to some point, but even though they KNOWBad results of Resurfacings are the result of bad
what causes notching of the femoral neck, why is itResurfacing - Derek McMinn
that some newer doctors still notch? It is inevitableA WELL DONE resurfacing works well, but is
that the first few times they do something, evenTECHNICALLY DIFFICULT. - Koen DeSmet
though they know to avoid certain things, until theyGo to an experienced surgeon that has no problem
get the hang of it, they WILL make mistakes. Evencontinuing their education on technique and will
some of the greats today will still make mistakescontinue to learn from other doctors by attending
now and then, after all, they are only human. But thethese conferences and sharing what they have
odds are, the more experience a doctor has, the lesslearned.
mistakes he will make. Again, Dr. Su in his videoAsk your doctor about experience and continued
interview near the end explains the learning curve ineducation on hip resurfacing. A LOT of new
stages really well. Go to Dr. Sus video interview toadvances have come about and unless the doctors
where the clock says around 3 minutes near the endare coming to these courses and learning them, there
on the referenced website under Doctors - Videois no way they could possibly know. Send them to
Interviews.this link and tell them they need to sign up for this
Instrumentation was discussed and it looks like manyonline. There was a ton of info presented at this
of the companies are coming out with better andconference and it is all available to them now. Click on
better instrumentation. With some of the designs itthe second referenced site to visit the Advanced
makes it nearly impossible for a doctor to notch aCourse Resurfacing website
neck due to the way the instrumentation is designedAnd...that sums up this patients perspective.