Secrets of the FDA Revealed by Top Insider Doctor: Part 3

According to the Journal of the American Medicalbelittles safety in the drug companies' interest.If the
Association (JAMA), "Adverse drug reactions are theFDA were to pull a drug due to safety issues, it
fourth leading cause of death in America. Reactionswould hurt the marketing of the drug. It might also
to prescription and over-the-counter medications killcall into question why they approved the drug in the
far more people annually than all illegal drug usefirst place. Therefore, you get this culture of
combined."Annually, drug companies spend billions oncover-up, this culture of suppression, this culture of
TV commercials and print media. They spend overdenial and this culture that demonstrates above all
$12 billion a year handing out drug samples andelse that industry is the client and not the American
employing sales forces to influence doctors topeople.Loudon: Have your peers turned against
promote specifically branded drugs. The drug industryyou?Dr. Graham: No. I've been very fortunate. Tom
employs over 1,200 lobbyists, including 40 formerDevine at GAP has told me that the experience of a
members of Congress. Drug companies have spenttypical whistleblower is that they'll have the support
close to a billion dollars since 1998 on lobbying. Inof their peers but the peers will be so afraid of
2004, drug companies and their officials contributedretaliation that they won't express that support in
at least $17 million to federal election campaigns.Topublic.I've had a very different experience. I've been
get a full diagnosis of this provocative story, highlybasically embraced by my peers as someone who
acclaimed health guru Gary Null sent his leadhas said what they want to say and what they
investigator and Director of Operations, Manettewished they had been able to say and that they
Loudon, to Washington, D.C. to interview FDArecognize as the truth. They're really proud of the
employee and Vioxx whistleblower Dr. David Graham.fact that I've said it and they're not afraid to be
What you are about to read may leave youseen with me. They're not afraid to work with me.
questioning the safety of all drugs, but it is a storyI've been pretty fortunate in that way.Now with
that must be told. Unless Congress steps up to themanagement it's been another story. Upper
plate and changes policy at the FDA, millions more willmanagement avoids me and doesn't talk to me. I
become unwitting victims of adverse drug reactionscould be walking down the hall and I'll say hello, and
from unsafe drugs.Manette Loudon: All of thesethey'll act like I'm not there. They don't give me
attacks backfired on them. Tell us a little bit aboutinteresting work assignments. They don't call me in to
that. Dr. Graham: Well, Sen. (Charles) Grassleyconsult on things that I should be consulted on even
(R-Iowa) and his staff quickly realized that what theythough I am the senior epidemiologist in the Office of
were saying about me was fabricated. The editor ofDrug Safety with more experience than any of the
The Lancet also realized that what the high level FDAother people there. I'm looked up to by the scientific
officials were saying to him was a pack of lies. Hestaff because of that expertise.Basically, I feel like
sent e-mails to them saying it looked to him as ifI'm in the Gulag.Loudon: How do you cope with that
they were trying to interfere with his editorialgoing to work each day?Dr. Graham: It's difficult. It's
process. He was very savvy to what these peoplea mind game. They're hoping that I'll just become
were doing.Tom Devine, as he said publicly, was veryvery frustrated and disillusioned and leave or that I'll
interested in doing the right thing. He said, "We don'tslip up in some way so that they can take some sort
want to protect somebody who's a lawbreaker andof action against me. As Tom Devine at GAP has
who really isn't representing the truth so producesaid, I have to be "Saint David." I can't afford to
your evidence." They had no evidence because theremake any mistakes.That's very difficult and it is a
is no evidence. But I produced my evidence. Ilittle bit discouraging. But I've been a target of
showed him all the documentation, all the emails, andretaliation in the past. You take 10 drugs off the
the reports that I've written. They flunked everymarket well, no good deed goes unpunished at the
test and I passed every test.In all of the criticism IFDA. I've experienced retaliation with many of those
have received relating to Vioxx and drug safety,other episodes but not as severe as what I've
they've never attacked the work or the science thatexperienced with Vioxx.This is the first time that my
I've done or the results that I've come to. Whatjob was actually in jeopardy and where the FDA
they've done is call me names. The ad hominemactually intended to fire me. That was stopped only
attack is the last refuge of the indefensible. Theybecause Sen. Grassley intervened. He put the heat on
don't have an argument that's substantial.They knowthe FDA and told them, "Lay off. This guy has told
that they're vulnerable. They know that they'vethe truth. He's helped America. Whose side are you
disserved the American people. The FDA ison?"Crusadorwould like to thank Manette Loudon and
responsible for 140,000 heart attacks and 60,000Pam Klebs for their help in putting this interview with
dead Americans. That's as many people as were killedDr. David Graham together.Crusadoris a hard-hitting,
in the Vietnam War.Yet the FDA points the finger atin-depth health publication that cuts through the
me and says, "Well, this guy's a rat, you can't trusthealth lies that are so prevalent in our world
him," but nobody is calling them to account. Congresstoday.Crusador is published every two months. To
isn't calling them to account. For the American people,obtain a free sample or to subscribe to this
it's dropped off the radar screen. They should beone-of-a-kind publication, visit their Web site. > Dr.
screaming because this can happen again.Loudon: OnMercola's Comment: Dr. David Graham has also helped
CNN with Lou Dobbs you said that there was awrite new legislation called the Grassley Dodd Bill that
certain "culture" that exists at the FDA. Can youis currently held up in committee. It is a radical bill that
explain what you meant by that?Dr. Graham: Theshould help transform the FDA back to its roots and
FDA has a very peculiar culture. It runs like the armyreally protect the public safety. It would set up a
so it's very hierarchal. You have to go through thenew independent Center inside the Food and Drug
chain of command and if somebody up above youAdministration (FDA) to review drugs and biological
says that they want things done in a particular wayproducts once they are on the market. The bill
well, they want it done in a particular way. Theaddresses the fact that the Office of New Drugs
culture also views industry as the client.They'recarries too much sway over the FDA's drug-safety
serving industry rather than the public. In fact, whenapparatus. Today, drug makers have the ability to
a former office director for the Office of Drugnegotiate with the FDA officials who approved their
Safety criticized me and tried to get me to change adrugs to begin with when the FDA considers
report I'd written on another drug -- Arava -- he saidcorrective action. By creating a Center for
to me and to a colleague who was a coauthor onpost-market review, this legislation puts you, the
this report that "industry is our client."I begged toAmerican consumers, where you belong at the FDA,
differ with him. I said, "No, industry is not the client,and that's front and center.I don't ask you to write
it's the American people, the people who pay ouryour congressman frequently, but this one is worth it.
taxes. That's who we're here to serve." He said, "No!You can help save some lives by helping to increase
Industry is our client." I ended the conversation bypressure to change the way the FDA is run. The
saying, "Well, industry may be your client, but it willdrug companies do NOT want this bill passed and
never be my client."Another aspect to the culture atthey have the largest lobby in Congress so we really
the FDA is that it overvalues the benefits of drugsneed all the help we can get.You can find out how to
and undervalues the risks of drugs. And so the FDAcontact your Congressman by going to the following
will always say to you, "Well, we're leaving this drugURL: All you need to do is write a simple short note
on the market because the benefits exceed thetelling them how you feel the FDA is critically broken
risks." Well, the FDA has never assessed the benefitand you believe that the new proposed legislation
of any drug that it's ever approved.It works onwould really help improve that.If you want to review
what's called efficacy. Does the drug work or not?the entire bill, it is up on the site. Related Articles: The
Does it lower your blood pressure or does it lowerFDA "Foxes" Keep Guarding the Drug Safety
your blood sugar? Not, does it prolong your life?"Henhouse"Testimony of David J. Graham, MD,
Does it prevent you from having a heartMPHVioxx Reapproved by FDA Panel Members With
attack?Those are benefits. All they focus on isTies to Drug CompaniesDr. Mercola is the founder of
efficacy.For example, ask the FDA why on earthMercola.com, one of the world's most visited and
they didn't ban high dose Vioxx after the VIGORtrusted health websites, and publisher of the free
Study showed in early 2000 that it increased the riske-newsletter -- the #1 dietary health and wellness
of heart attack by 500 percent? High-dose Vioxxnewsletter on the Web with over 500,000
was approved for the short-term treatment of acutesubscribers. Dr. Mercola, a physician for over two
pain. What earthly benefit was there that exceeds adecades, is also a New York Times bestselling author
500 percent increase in heart attack risk? Ask thewhose latest book, "Dr. Mercola's Total Health
FDA to produce its benefit analysis that shows thatProgram," presents his entire renowned dietary health
the benefits exceed the risks. It doesn't exist.Theprogram and has sold over 150,000 copies. He is
FDA has never looked at benefit. The FDA just saysroutinely interviewed by the media for his expert
to the American people, "The benefits exceed theinsights, including CNN and ABC World News Tonight.
risks. Trust me. Believe me." If you held the FDA toHis passion is to change the fatally flawed
its proof the American people would see how badlyconventional medical system to one focused on real
served they've been by the FDA and its culture thatprevention and cure.